Successfully obtained a judgment against tenants to vacate the property due to nuisance activities

Facts – Tenants within an association were engaging in numerous activities, which were supported by various witnesses who documented in detail the nuisances. The owner and tenants tried to claim that the tenants were purchasing the unit under a land contract, which they failed to provide, and therefore could not be evicted from the unit.

After three days of trial and witness testimony, Kaman & Cusimano obtained a judgment from court ordering that the tenants vacate the unit. Over $13,000 in legal fees were assessed back to the unit owner.

Categories

Three bars icon gold

Recent blog Posts

Three bars icon gold

Can Contractors Add Fuel Surcharges to Community Association Invoices?

In recent months, nationwide fuel prices have increased dramatically.  Condominium and homeowners’ associations are increasingly ...
Read More →

Why Your Condo Association Might Be Raising Your Dues Soon

Kaman & Cusimano Partner Scott Weiss was quoted in a recently published article in the ...
Read More →

What Should a Board Do if the City Asks for an Easement Over Association Property for a Public Project?

When a city asks an association to sign an easement agreement for a public project, ...
Read More →

How Will the New HUD Enforcement Shift Affect My Community Association?

The federal government has announced significant changes on how it will enforce the Fair Housing ...
Read More →