Successfully negotiated a settlement in a foreclosure case with an owner who combined two lots but claimed he owed for only one lot.

An owner within a homeowners association purchased two lots with the original agreement to pay assessments for both lots.  For tax purposes, the owner combined both lots but then refused to pay assessments for each lot.

Kaman & Cusimano successfully negotiated back payments for both lots and legal fees in the amount of $15,000, with the owners agreeing to the ongoing obligation to pay assessments on the two lots originally designated in the association’s development plat.

Categories

Three bars icon gold

Recent blog Posts

Three bars icon gold

Michelle Polly-Murphy Presented at the 2026 Ohio Lake Communities Conference

Attorney Michelle Polly-Murphy gave a presentation at the 2026 Ohio Lake Communities Association’s Annual Conference.  ...
Read More →

Putting Up Traffic Signs on HOA Private Roads: Are you doing it Right?

Community associations often want stop signs, speed limit signs, and crosswalk warnings to improve safety ...
Read More →

Eads, Murray & Pugh Joining Forces With Kaman & Cusimano

Expanding Excellence in Indiana Community Association Law Eads, Murray & Pugh and Kaman & Cusimano ...
Read More →

Can Community Associations hold a 50/50 raffle or bingo night to make money for the Association?

Community associations often look for creative ways to fund social events, amenities, or community improvements. ...
Read More →