Successfully negotiated a settlement in a foreclosure case with an owner who combined two lots but claimed he owed for only one lot.

An owner within a homeowners association purchased two lots with the original agreement to pay assessments for both lots.  For tax purposes, the owner combined both lots but then refused to pay assessments for each lot.

Kaman & Cusimano successfully negotiated back payments for both lots and legal fees in the amount of $15,000, with the owners agreeing to the ongoing obligation to pay assessments on the two lots originally designated in the association’s development plat.

Categories

Three bars icon gold

Recent blog Posts

Three bars icon gold

Eads, Murray & Pugh Joining Forces With Kaman & Cusimano

Expanding Excellence in Indiana Community Association Law Eads, Murray & Pugh and Kaman & Cusimano ...
Read More →

Can Community Associations hold a 50/50 raffle or bingo night to make money for the Association?

Community associations often look for creative ways to fund social events, amenities, or community improvements. ...
Read More →

Volunteers Deserve Protection Too – What Steps should the Association Take to Protect Board Members?

Community associations play a vital role in managing and maintaining common property, safeguarding the community’s financial investments, ...
Read More →

Experience Committees Create Joy and Functionality – Does Your Association Have One?

In recent years, a number of associations that we represent have created experience committees for their ...
Read More →