Assess the Situation: What is Considered a “Common Element?”

You may have read in the most recent CAI Law Reporter that an Association in Maryland was not authorized to suspend use privileges, absent such authority existing in the condominium declaration. Elvaton Towne Condominium Regime II, Inc. v. Rose, No. 33, Sept. Term 2016 (Md. Jun. 23, 2017). The basic facts of the case are the usual problem, a unit owner stops paying assessments for one reason or another and the association then notified the unit owner that their rights to use the pool were suspended until they were again current in their assessment payments. In the Elvaton case, the Maryland court reasoned that restricting the right to use the common element amounted to an unauthorized taking of the unit owners property, which the Association was not authorized to do absent some specific authority. The court held that the act provides that, except as provided in the declaration, the common elements are for the enjoyment of all unit owners and accordingly any restriction must be in a specific provision of the declaration.

Presumably, one would expect similar reasoning in Wisconsin based on the holding in the 2009 Apple Valley Gardens Association v. MacHutta Wisconsin Supreme Court case. In the Apple Valley case, the Wisconsin Supreme Court held that based on the Wisconsin Statutes use restrictions (preventing owners from renting their units) can be in either the Declaration or Bylaws. Accordingly, should a case arise in Wisconsin where the right to use a common element is suspended while assessments are unpaid, and assuming a properly worded use restriction existed in the Bylaws or Declaration of the Association, it’s expected that the courts in Wisconsin would uphold the restriction. However, because use restrictions are specifically authorized by statute – see 793.09 and 703.10 Wis. Stat., it’s presumed that placing such a right to prohibit use of the common elements in the rules may result in a finding similar to what occurred in Maryland. Consequently, if an association in Wisconsin is seeking to strengthen its enforcement or collection policy by prohibiting use of the common elements, it would be wise to amend either the Bylaws or the Declaration to allow for that authority.

Categories

Three bars icon gold

Recent blog Posts

Three bars icon gold

Community Associations Not Required to Comply with CTA in 2025

As Kaman & Cusimano clients are likely already aware, earlier this year, the US Treasury Department ...
Read More →

Shannon McCormick presented at the 2025 Ohio Lake Communities Association’s Annual Conference

Partner Shannon McCormick gave a presentation at the 2025 Ohio Lake Communities Association’s Annual Conference. ...
Read More →

Kaman & Cusimano Firm and 5 Attorneys recognized by The  Best Lawyers in America® 

Kaman and Cusimano is excited to announce that we have been recognized as a Best ...
Read More →

Big Projects / Big Decisions: Should your Community Association hire a Project Manager?

Hiring professional community association management is key to running a condominium or homeowner association – ...
Read More →